Service
You say one thing.
Your visuals argue another.
The problem
Most organizations don't have
a design problem.
Your visuals were produced by capable people. They went through approvals. They looked right at the time. And they're still working against you — because visual communication operates at a layer most organizations don't know how to audit.
Critical design theory and political sociology have frameworks for this. Most creative directors don't apply them to institutional communications.
"Organizations rarely have a design problem. They have a legibility problem — a gap between what they mean and what they show."
Deliverables
What you get.
Visual communications audit
Systematic review of your organization's visual output — social content, reports, campaign materials, press imagery. Claude processes at scale; the interpretation is human.
Intent vs. output analysis
Side-by-side mapping of your stated positioning against what your visuals are actually communicating — often to audiences you didn't account for.
Annotated asset review
Specific assets flagged with analysis: what's working, what's contradicting your message, and what's invisible to your team because you're too close to it.
Strategic recommendations
Concrete changes — not a style guide. What to fix, what to retire, what your next visual decisions should account for.
Debrief session (optional)
60-minute conversation to walk through findings, answer questions, and align on next steps. Available as an add-on.
Why this is different
The stack isn't just technical.
Claude processes volume and pattern at a scale no human reviewer can. But the analysis requires something else — a reader who understands how visual communication functions inside political, institutional, and cultural contexts.
Years of brand strategy, visual systems, and political communication work across MENA. Trilingual (EN/FA/KU). Theoretical grounding in digital power and platform governance. The compound stack is what makes the interpretation usable — not just technically correct.
Claude
Volume analysis, pattern detection, comparative review at scale.
Human
Political context, institutional credibility, cultural legibility, strategic implication.
Brands · institutions · founders
Anyone whose visual output carries institutional, political, or cultural weight.
Pricing
$1,200
per engagement
Scoped based on volume of materials and depth of analysis required. Engagements typically run 1–2 weeks from intake to delivery. Rush timelines available.